C.A.S.E. Worldwide                     My Account  Cart Contents  Checkout  
List of Contributors
   
Inside the Compendium
   
About the Editors
   
About the Sponsors
  Top » Catalog » Conditions of Use My Account  |  Cart Contents  |  Checkout   
Categories
Compendium (11)
Full Set (1)
Table of Contents
Anglo
Confucian Asia
Eastern Europe
Germanic Europe
Latin America
Latin Europe
Middle East
Nordic Europe
Southern Asia
Sub Saharan Africa
Gender
What's New? more
Family Business in Eastern Europe
Family Business in Eastern Europe
$25.00
Quick Find
 
Use keywords to find the product you are looking for.
Advanced Search
Information
Shipping & Returns
Privacy Notice
Conditions of Use
Contact Us
Inside the Compendium <font color="#cc3300" >Inside the Compendium</font>
Untitled Document

Culture-Specific Models of Family Businesses Worldwide

PREFACE TO THE COMPENDIUM

Overview

Our contention is that by gaining a deeper understanding of the culture-specific models (“emic” models), it will become feasible to develop robust cross-culturally comparable measures and standards (“etic” parameters) for assessing the nature of family involvement in family businesses. 

Etic parameters are conceptual constructs regarded as meaningful and appropriate by the scientific community. They may be of two types: (1) objective data, collected from the secondary sources, and (2) perceptual data, collected using primary methods. In this study, we use objective etic parameters primarily from the United Nations Development Program (UNDP, 2007); and the perceptual etic parameters primarily from the GLOBE program (House et. al., 2004). Both these types of parameters have reasonable scientific validity. They set the context in which the family businesses operate, and thus may be expected to influence the nature of family involvement. 

The generic etic parameters, however, are not sufficient for capturing the issues unique to the family businesses. For assessing these unique family business issues, C.A.S.E. has developed an additional set of nine etic parameters associated with the behaviors of the family businesses. These nine etic parameters are: (1) Regulated resource boundary, between the family, family business, and the external networks, (2) Emphasis on business reputation, as opposed to family reputation, (3) Proportion of bridging relationships, extending beyond the family’s relationships, (4) Pervasiveness of organizational professionalism, covering the entire organization, (5) Regulated family power, in ownership, management, as well as governance spheres, (6) Competitive succession, across generations, within generations, as well as between family and non-family employees, (7) Women in leadership, with more engaged roles for daughters, wives, as well as mothers, (8) Operational Resiliency, adaptable to family, business, as well as economic stresses, and (9) Contextual embeddedness, with goals focused on open conversations, cohesion and client focus.

Nine Family Business Etic Parameters of C.A.S.E.

1. Regulated resource boundary

In cultures with strongly regulated resource boundaries, a clear line is drawn between the resources of the family and of the business, and the business is expected and given freedom to seek non-family resources to cover its resource gaps. The business may engage quite freely in subcontracting relationships, hire professional managers, sell equity to the outsiders, take dept, and seek foreign technology, capital, and partnerships. However, this freedom may be regulated through the transfer of intangible resources, such as values, attitudes, and priorities, of the family to the family business. The criteria for securing non-family resources are clearly regulated, for instance to ensure compatibility of the values of the professional managers at the time of hiring with that of the family’s values as infused into the family business. 

In cultures with weakly regulated resource boundaries, the business relies actively on the family for its resource needs, and has an implicit obligation to take care of the family’s needs on an ongoing basis. If the family’s resources are limited, the business is expected to follow a conservative strategy. 

2. Emphasis on Business Reputation

In cultures with a strong emphasis on business reputation, the focus is on building a competitive and sustainable business, that would attract both the family successors as well as high quality external partners. The family business may give a cushion to various parties – such as suppliers and workers – in times of their need or in situations of poor performance, but that is intended to assure that its partners grow with it and that its foundations remain strong. 

In cultures with a weak emphasis on business reputation, the focus is on providing employment to all the members of the family, and using the lower cost family labor as a source of competitive advantaged. The family businesses tend to evaluate decisions, such as diversification, on the basis of their impact on family prestige and power. When a particular business fails, the families may seek to still meet the debt obligations in order to protect their reputation. 

3. Proportion of Bridging relationships

In cultures with low proportion of bridging relationships, the core competencies of the business are assumed to be rooted primarily in the home community of the family. The resource networks of the business – including employees, customers, and vendors – are predominantly comprised of the members of the community with whom the family has social relationships. Most business associates and key competitors are owned by the families in the same community. The choice of market domain and segments is guided by the skills, resources, and other strengths of the home community.

In cultures with high proportion of bridging relationships, the family businesses seek to “break-out” from the family and the community of the family in business, and to diversify and invest into the markets where the family has no roots. At the same time, they seek to develop family-like committed, engaging, and emphatic relationships with their key stakeholders and with the communities in which they invest. 

4. Pervasive Organizational Professionalism

In cultures where organizational professionalism is pervasive, there is a greater openness to employ professional managers, including at the senior leadership positions. The family businesses invest in scientific operations and control systems, formal management tools and methods, and in new technologies. The management style is team oriented, where the non-family employees are given freedom to participate in strategic decision making. There is a high level of trust between the family and non-family members.

In cultures where organizational professionalism is not pervasive, there is a reluctance to share power with the professional managers. Professional managers are either not hired, or are not promoted to the senior most leadership positions. Long years of service are required for the professional managers to gain trust of the family, and even then power is given to them because of their cultivation of social relations with the family, rather than because of their competencies in the business alone. The family businesses rely on intuition, informal techniques, and authoritarian leadership. The employees must accept the decisions by the family members, who hold the top positions.

5. Regulated Family Power

In cultures where the family power is strongly regulated, attempt is made to set protocols that would protect the business from the family dynamics. If some family members are not committed to the family business, they can readily exit without causing a break up of the family business. The family conflicts and influences are contained through a family forum, which provides a single channel for communication with the business. The criteria and boundaries for the employment, compensation, and managerial involvement of the family members are clearly laid down. Similarly, governance is structured in a way that allows for the family oversight, as well as access to key areas of external expertise.

In cultures where family power is weakly regulated, the family influences business in a number of ways on an ongoing basis. The family members may influence the strategic decisions, even if they are not involved in the management of the business, from behind the scenes and through their social relationships. The governance tends to be thin and opaque, and confined only to the family members. Confidentiality of information is considered an important source of competitive advantage. The power of individual family members is not limited, and they may single-handedly induce break up of the family business. The family business decisions are made to accommodate the interests of the family, such as for employing members and friends of the family. 

6. Competitive Succession

In cultures where the succession is competitive, the successors prepare themselves by getting education, and some work experience at the operating levels externally or inside the family business. The criteria for succession are specified clearly, and the successors must demonstrate competence to earn leadership. The successors enjoy attractive alternatives other than joining the family business, yet they make a conscious decision to join the family business. The predecessors transfer their knowledge of running the family business to the successors, and assign responsibilities in accordance with competence and interest to various family members. They gradually withdraw from the family business affairs, as the successors learn and gain knowledge about those affairs. After the succession, the predecessors either retire or are available only as sounding boards, leaving all business affairs to the successors. The board of directors may be involved in the process. Also, non-family employees may be considered for succession, particularly when no competent family member is available or interested.

In cultures where the succession is not competitive, the successors may have limited education and no experience other than working within their own family business. The successors are socialized into the family business from an early age, and are expected to assume the leadership when they grow up. The predecessors tend to continue holding reins and making strategic decisions – formally or informally behind the scenes – until their death. The successors may not get sufficient leadership training even after working for long years within the family business, and may lack confidence among the other family members and among the non-family employees. The employees are not given leadership positions, unless they have long standing friendly relationships with the family. If the family does not have a competent successor available, attempt is made to prospect successors from the extended boundaries of the family, including family cousins, in-laws, and friends. Daughters may be strategically married to bring in son-in-laws who could become the successors.

7. Women in Leadership

In cultures where leadership of women is endorsed, daughters are given equal rights to the family estate, to the participation in the governance, and to the senior management and leadership positions, even if sons are also present. Couple family businesses are more prominent. Women family members have clear strategic roles, such as taking leadership of new business lines, introducing professionalism, and introducing new technologies. Wives and mothers play an important role in building social relationships for the business, and in maintaining family commitment to the business. 

In cultures where leadership of women is not endorsed, daughters are excluded from the family estate, from participation in governance, and from senior management and leadership positions. They are given subservient, informal, and invisible roles, and are not permitted any decision making rights without consulting with and reporting to the male members. When no male successor is available, preference is given to marrying the daughters strategically to potential son-in-laws who could join the family business. 

8. Operational Resiliency

In operationally resilient cultures, family businesses are able to rely on the temporary assistance of the family, extended family, family friends, and acquaintances in times of need; or find their employees, vendors, customers, and communities willing to lend an extra helping hand because of the family feel relationships; or are able to hire professional managers on short notice for responding to the competitive forces. They follow a coherent diversification that insures them from market constraints in specific business lines, while also allowing synergies across different business lines. Through their services, they enjoy a premium in the market place, which protects them from the cost-based and technology-based competition of the non-family businesses. When operating in traditional and economically under-developed regions and sectors, they bring a sense of hope, optimism, and innovativeness. They continually rejuvenate and regenerate the regions, sectors, and communities they operate in.

In operationally non resilient cultures, family businesses are expected to provide employment for their family members, extended family members, family friends, and acquaintances, even if their competencies do not match the needs, and even if they lack motivation and commitment. The employees, vendors, customers, and communities do not take pride in the family orientation of the family business, and are unwilling to give it a slack in times of its need. The family businesses are either not diversified or diversified into unrelated areas, which leaves them vulnerable to market shocks and stretches their resources too thin. They are more susceptible to the cost and technology based competition from the non-family businesses. They operate in hostile environments, with minimalist resources and minimalist incomes. 

9. Contextual Embeddedness

Contextual embeddedness influences organizational goals, attitudes, and practices. In contextually embedded cultures, family businesses rely on direct, face-to-face communication characterized by informality and flexibility at all levels, in all their business operations – old or new, in traditional or emerging sectors, local or global. The emphasis is on using the family business experiences as a basis for competitive advantage and senior leadership. High levels of cultural cohesiveness extend to all the stakeholders, including the family, business, community, business partners, and employees. Dense communication channels are maintained with the customers, enabling high levels of personal relationships, responsiveness, customization, trust, and differentiation premium. The growth occurs organically, and investments are made primarily in the local community or through family and community connections. Globalization tends to be avoided, or limited to culturally proximate regions. 

In contextually un-embedded cultures, family businesses use more formal, structured, and indirect communication channels at different levels, and in many of their business operations. External education and outside experiences are given high importance in leadership appointments, and for strategic decision making. Mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, and other similar channels for rapid growth are pursued. There is also a greater openness to globalization, if need be by hiring professional managers and by using information technology. 

Research Methodology

C.A.S.E. issued a call for papers in mid December, 2005 inviting family business scholars to submit previously published and unpublished articles on family businesses in ten specific cultural regions of the world. The taxonomy of cultural regions was taken from the work of Gupta and Hanges (2004) as part of the GLOBE project. In that work, Gupta and Hanges (2004) formulate and validate ten cultural region classification using a 61-society GLOBE sample. The ten cultural regions, and their core religious and historical foundations (besides geography), are as follows:

Western World

1) Anglo – Protestant religion, English heritage

2) Latin Europe – Catholic religion, Roman heritage

3) Latin America – Catholic religion, Spanish Iberian heritage

4) Nordic Europe – Lutheran religion, Norman heritage

5) Germanic Europe – Protestant religion, Germanic heritage

Eastern World

a) Eastern Europe – Orthodox religion, Communist heritage

b) Sub-Saharan Africa – Tribal customs, Tribal heritage

c) Middle East – Islam religion, Arab heritage

d) Southern Asia – Indo-centric religion, Vedic heritage

e) Confucian Asia – Sino-centric religion, Confucian heritage

The call invited the following type of contributions:

• Empirically based articles that identify the distinguishing features of different types of family businesses within specific societies or regions.

• Empirically based articles that contrast family businesses in specific societies or regions with non-family businesses.

• Reviews of literature on the family businesses in specific societies or regions.

• Major theoretical frameworks on the family businesses in specific societies or regions.

• Case studies on noteworthy family businesses in specific societies or regions, clearly highlighting family business dynamics unique to those societies or regions.

• Survey –based articles that bring out the distinguishing features of the family businesses within specific societies or regions.

• Articles on the distinctive challenges, problems, and opportunities facing the family businesses of specific societies or regions.

To keep the project manageable, a six month cut off was established. A total of 220 articles were received by mid-June 2006. These articles were reviewed by at least two qualified reviewers independently. After revisions, a total of 110 articles were finally selected. These included 10 articles on family businesses from each of the ten cultural regions, and 10 additional articles focusing on gender in family business. When we looked at the 110 articles that passed the review process, we found that we had at least ten articles from each region. We took out the gender focused articles from regions where we had more than ten passing articles, and collated them into a separate gender-focused set. In total, the 110 articles covered family business dynamics in 60 different nations. On average, six different nations were represented from each of the ten cultural clusters, ranging from 4 nations in Anglo cluster to 10 nations in Sub-Saharan Africa cluster. 

Significance of the Study

For each of the cultural clusters, we use the emic insights to assess the dominant family business model in terms of the nine C.A.S.E. etic parameters. Our goal is not to provide a comprehensive snapshot of all the family businesses operating in different clusters. Instead, we are seeking to develop a heuristic understanding of the context within which most family businesses in specific cultural clusters operate. The etic comparability of the models reported in the compendium allows them to be scientifically tested, verified, and possibly falsified in future research. At the same time, we find substantial variations in the nature of family involvement in different cultures, and in how the nine dimensions of family businesses are enacted. 

C.A.S.E. framework and findings for studying family business across cultures can be very useful in family business education. Family businesses tend to be repositories of the unique and distinctive cultural endowments of their communities, enabling the members of the family and the community to take power and leadership positions beyond the local boundaries, extending nationally and globally. They are an important form of business, usually characterized by dedicated social and psychological capital, long time horizon, low information and transaction costs, high spontaneity and agility, robust values and character, leadership roles for women in family, and entrepreneurial motivation. They bring and have potential to bring considerable richness to the families, communities, and nations. Since the institution of family is very closely intertwined with that of culture, and is in fact the founding building bloc of societal culture, it is important to use a culture-sensitive lens while assessing family businesses, and while seeking to develop strategies and resolve

challenges facing family businesses. 

Our research is only a step in the direction of developing cross-culturally relevant pedagogical resources for teaching about and training in family businesses. We believe it is a step in the right direction. 

References:

Gupta, V., & Hanges, P.J. (2004). Regional and climate clustering of societal cultures. In R.J. House, P.J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P.W. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds.). Culture, leadership, and organizations. The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp.178-218). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

House R. J., Hanges P.J., Javidan M., Dorfman P.W., & Gupta V. (Eds.). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

UNDP (2007). Human Development Report. Geneva: United Nations. 

 

 

Continue
Shopping Cart more
0 items
Bestsellers
01.Anglo Family Business
02.Culturally Sensitive Models of Family Businesses Worldwide (set)
03.Family Business in Confucian Asia
04.Family Business in Southern Asia
Specials more
Culturally Sensitive Models of Family Businesses Worldwide (set)
Culturally Sensitive Models of Family Businesses Worldwide (set)
$250.00
$220.00
Reviews more
Culturally Sensitive Models of Family Businesses Worldwide (set)
“This compendium set is thought-provoki-
ng and path-breaking ..

5 of 5 Stars!
Currencies

This site is Created and Maintained by

C.A.S.E. Worldwide